|
Public Scholarship in the Department of Communication
(Jump down to graduate student writings on public scholarship...)
The Department of Communication brought together two units at the University
of Washington: the School of Communications and the Department of Speech Communication.
This 2002 merger gave the faculty the opportunity to reflect on the core
principles underlying their philosophy of graduate education. One of these
principles is public scholarship. The Department faculty and students take their
research beyond the confines of the academy to engage in constructive dialogue
not only with academics but also with other citizens, diverse communities, and
political and cultural leaders. Such dialogue increases the potential transformative
power of communication scholarship, while also fulfilling a central mission of
a public research university.
Many other academic institutions have renewed their emphasis on the public
mission of the university. One at the University of Washington is the Simpson
Center’s Connecting
with the Community institutes for doctoral students. Additional sites of interest
include the following:
Faculty Statement on Public Scholarship
In 2004, the faculty approved a formal statement on public scholarship. This
statement is designed to clarify the meaning of this principle for faculty and
students who wish to carry out public scholarship projects. The statement reads,
in part,
“Scholarship and citizenship go hand in hand. Although scholars in higher education
ultimately work on behalf of their communities, their nations and the world, much
of their scholarship stays within the traditional research process, subject to
peer review and publication in discipline-based journals and books, although available
for review and application by persons and institutions outside of the academy.
Scholars also directly engage the world beyond the academy, drawing on scholarship
developed in the rigor of disciplinary tradition. Productive efforts of this kind,
herein called public scholarship, may take many forms, such as popularization
of research-based ideas in a variety of media and formats, facilitation of deliberation
about such social values as equality, justice and freedom, and explanation or
appreciation of texts, concepts, values or events. Such efforts can promote constructive
dialogue with and among students, citizens, diverse communities, and political
and cultural leaders.”
Additional language in the faculty statement can be used for purposes of evaluation
for tenure or promotion, and the full statement is available on request from the
Department. (If interested, please contact Patrick Olsen ).
Graduate Course in Public Scholarship
To ensure that all students have the opportunity to reflect on their own work
in relation to larger public purposes, one of the three core courses in the department
focuses on public scholarship. COM 502 (Communication Scholarship and Public Life)
examines what it means to be a public scholar, looks at relevant examples of public
scholarship from the recent and distant past, and encourages students to make
connections between their own research interests and communities outside academia.
The course was first taught in Spring 2003, and the syllabi from each year are
available for review: 2006 Syllabus
|
2004 Syllabus | 2003 Syllabus
Student Writings on Public Scholarship
In 2006, a team of graduate students in the department sought to further clarify
the meaning, history, and types of public scholarship that exist. Carlys Allen,
Tamara Barnett, Ben Crosby, Elizabeth Scherman, and Lea Werbel worked collaboratively
with course instructor John Gastil on a document that you can read here.
In the 2004 Communication Scholarship and Public Life seminar, the students
wrote biographical and historical papers on public scholars and instances of public
scholarship projects. Some of these papers have been made available on this site,
and they can help the reader get a sense for the variety of ways scholars can
connect their work with larger publics. The students share these papers, most
of which are no more polished than a typical seminar paper, in the spirit of public
engagement—putting their own views into the larger conversation on public scholarship.
Meredith Bagley, “A
Game Plan: Tips from Pat Griffin on Public Scholarship."
Deborah Bassett, “Mary
Parker Follett: A Public Scholar “Far Ahead of Her Time.”
Alice Marwick, “crossing
boundaries, reaching out: the public scholarship of bell hooks.”
Adrienne Massanari, “Public
scholarship amidst tragedy: Lessons from the Rwandan genocide.”
Leah Sprain, "Sending
Signals from the Ivory Tower: Barriers to Connecting Academic Research to the
Public"
|