Ph.D., Northwestern University, 1995
Office: CMU 145
Leah Ceccarelli, Professor, is a rhetorical critic and theorist. Her research focuses on interdisciplinary and public discourse about science. She also explores metacritical issues surrounding rhetorical inquiry as a mode of research. She teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in American Public Address, Public Debate, Rhetorical Criticism, Classical Rhetoric, and Rhetoric of Science. She directs the UW Science, Technology, and Society Studies Graduate Certificate program. She serves on the editorial boards of Rhetoric & Public Affairs, Quarterly Journal of Speech, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, and Philosophy & Rhetoric, and is Co-Editor of Transdisciplinary Rhetoric (a book series sponsored by the Rhetoric Society of America and Penn State University Press).
Ceccarelli, L. (in press) “Bioscience as Change Agent: Rhetorics of Restraint and Inevitability in Response to Advances in Genetic Technologies,” in Rhetoric’s Change: Rhetoric Society of America Selected Conference Proceedings, edited by Jenny Rice and Chelsea Graham (Parlor Press).
Ceccarelli, L. (in press) “Pioneers, Prophets and Profligates: George W. Bush’s Presidential Response to Scientific Resistance,” in Reading the Presidency: Advances in Presidential Rhetoric, edited by Mary Stuckey and Stephen Heidt (Peter Lang Publishing Group).
Nelson, S. C., Yu, J.-H. & Ceccarelli, L, (2015). “How Metaphors About the Genome Constrain CRISPR Metaphors: Separating the ‘Text’ From Its ‘Editor’,” The American Journal of Bioethics, 15.12, 60-62.
Ceccarelli, L. “Scientific Ethos and the Cinematic Zombie Outbreak,” Mètode: Science Studies Journal 6 (2016): 107-13.
Ceccarelli, L. (2014) “Where’s the Rhetoric? Broader Impacts in Collaborative Research,” Poroi, 10.1, article 12.
Ceccarelli, L. On the Frontier of Science: An American Rhetoric of Exploration and Exploitation (Michigan State UP, 2013).[Winner of the National Communication Association Public Address Division’s Marie Hochmuth Nichols Award for best book, 2014.]
Ceccarelli, L. (2013). “Controversy Over Manufactured Scientific Controversy: A Rejoinder to Fuller,” Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 761-66.
Ceccarelli, L. (2013) “To Whom Do We Speak? The Audiences for Scholarship on the Rhetoric of Science and Technology.” Poroi, 9.1, article 7.
Ceccarelli, L. (2013). “Crossing Frontiers of Science: Trespassing into a Godless Space or Fulfilling Our Manifest Destiny?” in After the Genome: A Language for Our Biotechnological Future, ed. Michael J. Hyde and James A. Herrick (Baylor UP), 83-97.
Ceccarelli, L. (2011). “Manufactured Scientific Controversy: Science, Rhetoric, and Public Debate,” Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 195-228. [Winner of the American Foresics Association’s Daniel Rohrer Memorial Outstanding Research Award, 2012.]
Ceccarelli, L. (2011). “Controversy over Uncertainty: Argumentation Scholarship and Public Debate about Science,” Proceedings of the Seventh Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. Frans H. van Eemeren, et al. (Amsterdam: Rozenbirg/Sic Sat), 254-60.
Ceccarelli, L. (2010). “Interpretive Communities in Science,” in Encyclopedia of Science and Technology Communication, ed. Susanna Priest (Sage Publications), 415-18.
Ceccarelli, L. (2007). “Creating Controversy about Science and Technology,” in Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. Frans H. van Eemeren, et al. (Sic Sat), 231-34.
Ceccarelli, L. (2005). “Let Us (Not) Theorize the Spaces of Contention,” Argumentation and Advocacy 42.1: 30-33.
Ceccarelli, L. (2005). “Science and Civil Debate: The Case of E. O. Wilson’s Sociobiology,” in Rhetoric and Incommensurability, edited by Randy Alan Harris (Parlor Press), 271-93.
Ceccarelli, L. (2005). “A Hard Look at Ourselves: A Reception Study of Rhetoric of Science,” Technical Communication Quarterly, 14.3: 257-65.
Ceccarelli, L. (2005). “The Ends of Rhetoric Revisited: Three Readings of Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address.” The Viability of the Rhetorical Tradition, edited by Richard Graff, Arthur E. Walzer, and Janet M. Atwill (SUNY Press), 47-60.
Ceccarelli, L. (2004). “Rhetoric of Science and Technology,” in Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics, Vol. 3: L-R, Ed. Carl Mitchem (Detroit: Macmillan Reference), 1625-29.
Ceccarelli, L. (2004). “Neither Confusing Cacophony nor Culinary Complements: A Case Study of Mixed Metaphors for Genomic Science.” Written Communication, 21.1, 92-105.
Ceccarelli, L. and Bixler, N. (2002). “Losing Control of an Extended Analogy: Lessl’s Analysis of Gnostic Scientism.” Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 5.4, 709-17.
Ceccarelli, L. (2002). “Rhetoric and the Field of Human Genomics: The Problems and Possibilities of Mixed Metaphors.” Gene(sis): Contemporary Art Explores Human Genomics: Exhibition Website and CD-ROM Catalogue, edited by Robin Held, Seattle, Henry Art Gallery.
Ceccarelli, L. (2002). “A Scientific Rhetoric.” Review of Communicating Science: The Scientific Article from the 17th Century to the Present by Alan G. Gross, Joseph E. Harmon and Michael Reidy. Science, 298.5594, 757.
Ceccarelli, L. (2001) Shaping Science with Rhetoric: The Cases of Dobzhansky, Schrodinger, and Wilson. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. [Winner of the Rhetoric Society of America Book Award, 2004.]
Ceccarelli, L. (2001) “Rhetorical Criticism and the Rhetoric of Science.” Western Journal of Communication, 65.3, 314-29.
Ceccarelli, L. (1998). “Polysemy: Multiple Meanings in Rhetorical Criticism.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, 84.4, 394-414. [Winner of the National Communication Association Golden Anniversary Monograph Award, 1999.]
Ceccarelli, L. (1997). “The Ends of Rhetoric: Aesthetic, Political, Epistemic.” Making and Unmaking the Prospects for Rhetoric, edited by Theresa Enos (Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Publishers), 65-74.
Ceccarelli, L., Doyle, R., and Selzer, J. (1996). Introduction to the Special Issue on Rhetoric of Science. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 26.4, 7-12.
Ceccarelli, L. (1995). “A Rhetoric of Interdisciplinary Scientific Discourse: Textual Criticism of Dobzhansky’s Genetics and the Origin of Species.” Social Epistemology, 9.2, 91-111.
Ceccarelli, L. (1994). “A Masterpiece in a New Genre: The Rhetorical Negotiation of Two Audiences in Schrodinger’s What Is Life?” Technical Communication Quarterly, 3.1, 7-17.