
A lab technician for the Louisiana Department of Public Health demonstrates how dangerous substances are opened and handled in a special cabinet that prevents the substances from contaminating the environment. (AP Photo/Cheryl Gerber)
Accuracy of Scientific Broadcasts Found to be Poor
By Brittany Samms
There has always been controversy over the accuracy of our television news broadcasts, specifically when these programs deal with science. A study conducted by the Pew Research Center found that 83% of scientists rate television news coverage of scientific research as poor. Statistics are only slightly better when scientific studies are covered by newspapers, with 36% of scientists rating the coverage good.
Future Editions
Issue 2: Media as International Actor (forthcoming Nov. 30, 2009)
Issue 3: Media as Global Change Agent (forthcoming Dec. 16, 2009)
In this Issue:
Feature Articles
Peter Carrs
Katharine Cuyle
research reviews
Countries View the Iraq War Differently
Christine Strawn
National Importance or Public Interest?
Jeannie Ryder
PROFILES
Somaliland – Africa’s Best Kept Secret?
Tilda Palmer
A New Breed of Watchdog Journalism
Carrie McBride
Watchdog Organizations Keep Media, Government in Check
Michelle D. Matulac
In Our Opinion...
Media: Government Watchdog or Lapdog?
Brianne Ibanes
America: Land of the Free, Home of the Know-It-Alls
Jessica McSperitt
Hard to Find Positives in International News and Images
Bryden McGrath
Did You Know...
Accuracy of Scientific Broadcasts Found to be Poor
Brittany Samms
Raanan Schnitzer
Christine Roughan

